Personal Home Page

+

Personal Information

Name (Pinyin):zhenzhen

School/Department:林学院

Education Level:With Certificate of Graduation for Doctorate Study

Degree:Doctoral Degree in Agriculture

Status:Employed

Discipline:
Forest Management

Honors and Titles:
2024年10月 东北林业大学2023~2024年度优秀本科生导师奖
2023年11月 获得2023年东北林业大学青年教师教学竞赛(农林组)二等奖
2023年04月 第十届“共享杯”大学生科技资源共享服务创新大赛优秀指导教师奖
2023年08月 东北林业大学2022~2023年度优秀本科生导师奖
2023年07月 指导本科生参加“挑战杯”黑龙江省大学生课外学术科技作品大赛荣获三等奖
2022年10月 东北林业大学2021~2022年度优秀本科生导师奖
2021年09月 东北林业大学2020~2021年度教学质量二等奖
2021年05月 指导本科生参加美国大学生数学建模大赛(ICM)获得一等奖(M奖)
2020年10月 东北林业大学2019~2020年度教学质量二等奖
2019年12月 东北林业大学林学院2019年度本科课程建设优秀奖
2018年06月 第七届梁希青年论文奖三等奖
2017年10月 东北林区主要树种(组)林木及林分动态预测技术,黑龙江省科学技术奖,二等奖(第8完成人),黑龙江省人民政府
2017年04月 东北林区主要树种(组)基础模型系统的研究,梁希林业科学技术奖,二等奖(第6完成人),国家林业局,中国林学会
2016年12月 GIScience & Remote Sensing杂志最佳审稿人
2016年09月 第六届梁希青年论文奖三等奖
2015年12月 第三届“共享杯”大学生科技资源共享服务创新大赛优秀指导教师奖
2015年09月 东北林业大学2014~2015年度教学质量二等奖
2014年09月 第五届梁希青年论文奖二等奖

Other Contact Information:

ZipCode:

PostalAddress:

Email:


Bayesian geographically weighted regression and its application for local modeling of relationships between tree variables

Date:2025-06-02 clicks:

Impact Factor:1.836

DOI number:10.3832/ifor2574-011

Journal:iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Key Words:Spatial Autocorrelation, Spatial Heterogeneity, Robust Regression, Spatially Varying Coefficients Models

Abstract:Geographically weighted regression (GWR) has become popular in recent years to deal with spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity in forestry and ecological data. However, researchers have realized that GWR has some limitations, such as correlated model coefficients across study areas, strong influence of outliers, weak data problem, etc. In this study, we applied Bayesian geographically weighted regression (BGWR) and a robust BGWR (rBGWR) to model the relationship between tree crown and diameter using observed tree data and simulated data to investigate model fitting and performance in order to overcome some limitations of GWR. Our results indicated that, for observed tree data, the rBGWR estimated tree crown more accurate than both BGWR and GWR. For the simulated data, 74.1% of the estimated slope coefficients by rBGWR and 73.4% of the estimated slope coefficients by BGWR were not significantly different (α = 0.05) from the corresponding simulated slope coefficients. The estimation of model coefficients by rBGWR was not sensitive to outliers, but the coefficient estimation by GWR was strongly affected by those outliers. The majority of the coefficient estimates by rBGWR and BGWR for weak observations were not significantly (α = 0.05) different from the simulated coefficients. Therefore, BGWR (including rBGWR) may be a better alternative to overcome some limitations of GWR. In addition, both BGWR and rBGWR were more powerful than GWR to detect the spatial areas with non-constant variance or spatial outliers.

Co-author:Lianjun Zhang

First Author:Q1, Nirmal Subedi

Indexed by:Journal paper

Correspondence Author:Zhen Zhen*

Volume:11

Issue:5

Page Number:542

ISSN No.:1971-7458

Translation or Not:no

Date of Publication:2018-01-01

Included Journals:SCI

Pre One:Global and Geographically Weighted Quantile Regression for Modeling the Incident Rate of Children’s Lead Poisoning in Syracuse, NY, USA Next One:Exploring spatially varying relationships between children’s lead poisoning and environmental factors